RETURN
TO CURRENT ISSUE
"This isn't my community, how can I care
about whether there is crime in the community?- we heard an
organizer quoted as saying recently. "It is not my issue,
therefore, I don't have the resources or the passion or the
desire to do it." The quote goes on to speak about the need
for people being involved and that it is their passion and desire
that carries the issue.
Although there is truth in the speaker's words, there's
something very wrong about these words, too. They ignore the fact
that an organizer doesn't just need the skills to build the
organization, but also needs white hot anger to respond to people
being screwed.
The first part of the quote was spoken like a technician, not
an organizer. The technician brings a removed, detached observation
of the issue, which an organizer must have. But if that is all
that organizers bring to their work, then they are like the doctor
who says, "Sorry, you have terminal cancer. Next patient please,
nurse."
If the organizer does not bring a white hot anger to any issue
where people are being screwed, then they bring only half of the
ingredients to the recipe. Even with my limited cooking abilities
I know you can't make anything worth eating with half a recipe.
The organizer who brings the skills of a technician, but not the
anger, presents the issue in an entirely different manner than
the organizer who brings the skills of a technician and the white
hot anger at people getting screwed.
The technician comes in to the community, gets a meeting together
and starts the meeting by saying, "The school district spends
$4,500 per pupil a year in your area, but in the rich area of
the district it spends $7,500 per pupil a year. Does that upset
you? Would you like to do something about it?"
I would expect a variety of responses from the residents of the
community where the school district spent less per pupil. The
responses might range from "I'm mad as hell!" to "Well,
that is the way it always has been," to "They pay more
taxes than we do, so I guess that more should be spent there."
The meeting then probably degenerates into an argument about the
right to be angry and whether the rich have the right to have
more money spent in their community because they pay more taxes.
After two hours the group decides to meet again next week to see
if something can be done.
But the organizer who brings to the room the combination of technician
and white hot anger at people being screwed doesn't just come
in and present the figures. The organizer then adds comments like,
"What that means is the school board says those rich kids
are worth twice as much as our kids. Who here thinks those rich
kids are twice as important than ours?"
The organizer goes on: "This means that our tax dollars are
subsidizing the rich so they can go to college and become doctors
and lawyers, while our kids will end up flipping hamburgers. Who
here has the dream for their kid that they will be hamburger flippers
all their lives? So what are we going to do?"
The discussion now moves immediately to how we are going to stop
our kids from being screwed.
Organizers bring not only their technician skills, but also white
hot anger at people being screwed, to whatever situation they
face. For the good organizer knows that people need not only technical
skills, but the freedom to express and act on their anger. The
good organizer's task is to frame the issue in such a way
that people not only recognize they are being screwed, since they
probably know that already, but that it is OK to be mad about
it and OK to put that anger into action.
So the issue becomes not only is the school board spending almost
twice as much per pupil in another district--the technical
part of the issue--but equally important the issue becomes
that the school board thinks those kids are worth twice as much
as our kids, the emotional part of the issue. Emotions like anger
are part of being a human being that were put there by our Creator.
The good organizer celebrates anger's presence and gives people
the liberty to express it and act on it.
|