Return
to Current Issue
"It wasn't the ordinance we wanted, but it will do for
a start,' was the consensus among leaders who pushed the first-ever
local regulation of predatory subprime mortgage lending through
Chicago's City Council in August.
"At least the city is formally recognizing how severe a problem
we have with predatory lending here and taking steps to bar lenders
doing business with the city from engaging in the practice,"
Gale Cincotta of NTIC said.
The two 'triggers' at the heart of the ordinance were
weaker than groups wanted. The triggers would disqualify lenders
who engage in predatory practices from doing business with the
city.
The first trigger covers the annual percentage rate, or APR. Lenders
who hold the first lien on a mortgage, i.e. lenders who would
be paid off first in the event of a foreclosure, would be subject
to the ordinance if they charged an APR greater than 6 percent
plus the T-bill rate (the 30-year constant rate of maturity,
reported by the Federal Reserve and used in fair lending laws;
5.71 percent as of August 21)--11.71 percent in today's
numbers. Lenders of so-called junior mortgages, such as second
loans (for example, the originator of a $5,000 home repair loan
that did not include debt consolidation), would be subject to
the ordinance if they charged an APR of 8 percent plus the T-bill
rate, or 13.71 percent in today's numbers.
The other trigger under the ordinance is the percentage of the
loan the lender charged in fees. Predatory loans under the ordinance
would be those on which the lender charged the greater of $800
or more than 5 percent of a loan's principal in fees. Fees
deemed predatory under the ordinance would include prepayment
penalties after 36 months, and payments to mortgage brokers.
Loans would be considered predatory if they met one of the triggers
and did any of practices listed under this ordinance. The ordinance
also defines certain practices as predatory, such as restricting
monthly payments on a subprime loan to no more than 50 percent
of a borrower's total monthly bills and "flipping"--the
practice of repeated refinancings on the same property. Deceptive
marketing and sales practices generally are also defined as predatory,
as are some types of balloon payments, and some charges associated
with home improvement loans.
Chicago groups plan to use the ordinance with the state, with
the feds, with the banking regulators, and with anybody else who
wants to get involved in predatory lending.
|